Credibility of the PCR Test and Statistic Accuracy

PCR-Test:

The test first used to detect SARS-CoV-2 was the PCR Test, known as polymerase
chain reaction. It’s a test detects and amplifies genetic material from a specific
organism so that it may be studied.

Oddly enough, the inventor of the PCR Test, Kary Mullis, specifically said that the
PCR Test is NOT supposed to be used for diagnostics and is only to study genetic
material. He is quoted saying: “PCR is just a process that’s used to make a whole
lot of something out of something. That’s what it is, but it doesn’t tell you that
you’re sick and it doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with, really was
going to hurt you or anything like that”.

Video:

Attorney and Doctor, Reiner Fuellmich has exposed that “Dr.” Christian Drosten
who was endorsed by the World Health Organization, created a prototype pcr-test
that ran at 40 cycles which the World Health Organization had approved for the
world to test COVID-19. A Cease & Desist order has been made against Dr.
Drosten, led by Dr. Fuellmich and his team. A number of highly respected
scientists worldwide assume that there has never been a corona pandemic, but
only a PCR test pandemic. This is the conclusion reached by many German
scientists such as Professors Bhakdi, Reiss, Mölling, Hockertz, Walach and many
others, including the above-mentioned Professor John Ioannidis and the Nobel
Laureate Prof. Michael Levitt from Stanford University.
Source: https://ratical.org/PandemicParallaxView/CrimesAgainstHumanity-Fuellmich.html. On this website Dr. Fuellmich explains the details in his video and the website touches on a lot of subjects of concern.

One of the top health leaders in USA who people were listening to for advice
concerning COVID-19, Anthony Fauci, says that any PCR cycle threshold over 35 is
dead nucleotides. He’s quoted saying: “If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more,
that the chances of it being replication competent are miniscule. There are
patients and it’s very frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians
somebody comes in and they repeat their PCR and it’s like 37 cycle threshold, but
you can almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle. So I think if
somebody does come in with 37, 38 even 36 you gotta’ say you know it’s just dead
nucleotides period.”
Video:

The World Health Organization has also questioned the PCR test at a high cycle
threshold value: “…the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any
background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct)
value result being interpreted as a positive result.” and also: “…the distinction
between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to
ascertain.”
Photo:

The first official COVID-19 sample named:
“Wuhan-Hu- 1”, sample from Wuhan patient, PCR Ct value: 35 cycles. Page 2 of
“Isolation and Identification of a Rare Spike Gene Double-Deletion SARS-CoV-2
Variant From the Patient With High Cycle Threshold Value”:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8770430/
This study also quotes: “The limitation of RT–PCR is that it cannot distinguish
fragmented RNA genomes from live transmissible viruses.”

Public health organisations in the beginning of the pandemic, such as Ontario
Public health declared that they created a PCR-Test that ran at between 38 and 40
cycles. They said: “At PHO (Public Health Ontario), we have developed a PCR test

in our lab, with positive and negative cutoff points. The cutoff point for a positive
result for PHO’s developed lab test is 38 cycles. This means that if the virus is
found at or before 38 cycles are completed, then the test is considered positive.
The cutoff point for a negative result is 40 cycles. If the virus is detected between
38 and 40 cycles, we call this an indeterminate or inconclusive result. All
inconclusive results are considered probable (likely) cases for public health
reporting.”
Source: https://www.publichealthontario.ca/en/about/blog/2021/explained-covid19-pcr-testing-and-cycle-thresholds

Here is a list of PCR companies who had a greater than 35 cycle threshold from the
beginning of the pandemic: Gnomegen 39 cycles, GK 40 cycles, InBios 45 cycles,
Luminex 45 cycles, Quest Diagnostics 50 cycles.
Photo:

Countries around the world have caught on that the PCR Test is unreliable when it
comes to diagnostics. Countries such as Portugal have said the PCR test “is unable
to determine, beyond reasonable doubt, that a positive result corresponds, in fact,
to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus”, said the Lisbon Court of
Appeal.
Source: https://www.theportugalnews.com/news/2020-11-27/covid-pcr-test-reliability-do
ubtful-portugal-judges/56962

The CDC says that if you test positive it could be from the common cold. “A
positive test result shows you might have antibodies from an infection with the
virus that causes COVID-19. However, there is a chance that a positive result
means that you have antibodies from an infection with a virus from the same
family of viruses (called coronaviruses), such as the one that causes the common
cold.”
Photo:


After the presentation of numerous facts and proof behind the accuracy of the
PCR-Test from health professionals around the world, the CDC finally crumbled on
July 21, 2021 and decided to change the recommendation for testing for
COVID-19. They say: “After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization
(EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR
Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of
SARS-CoV-2 only.” and also “In preparation for this change, CDC recommends
clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV
RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized
COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed
method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and
influenza viruses.”

Source: https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html

Rapid Test:

A video went viral of someone saying that their brother got sent home from work
because he tested positive for covid. His brother asked him to send them the data
sheet of the results which he shows in the video. The data sheet shows a list of
coronaviruses and what was detected was Coronavirus 229E which is the common
cold.
Video:


Coronavirus 229E is the common cold:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/general-information.html

Premier Doug Ford’s medical expert, Dr. Barbara Yaffe expressed her concerns of
the relevance of testing as “solving the problem” and goes on to point out the
worry that testing in places with low transmission would create false positives.
Video:

There poses a big question as to the validity of the rapid test that the Ontario
government was encouraging everyone to get and do. In a live video provided here, we have a personal affiliate who squeezes drops into a covid rapid test and the results come out as “T” which means positive for covid-19: https://www.who.int/diagnostics_laboratory/eual/eul_0563_117_00_standard_q
_covid19_ag_ifu.pdf
Video:

Public health officials insisted that this new “covid-19” had nothing to do with the
flu. But mysteriously when the pandemic hit, the world wide flu ratings flatlined.
Coincidence? The World Health Organization released a graph showing the
previous years of flu ratings and it flatlining in 2020.
Photo:

Ontario MD Physician, Kulvinder Kaur presented COVID-19 statistics from:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.08.21260210v1. Even with
the obscure PCR method for testing, the Survival rate shows that COVD-19 has an
extremely low mortality rate, just as the common cold does.

Age Infection Survival Rate
0-19 99.9973%
20-29 99.986%
30-39 99.969%
40-49 99.918%
50-59 99.73%
60-69 99.41%
70+ 97.6% (non-inst.)
70+ 94.5% (all)
Photo:

Source: https://twitter.com/dockaurg/status/1432002254580719617?lang=en

After the continuous outcry from health professionals and politicians like Roman
Baber, stressing the non-relevance for wide testing and to focus on high risk
settings, Ontario’s Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Kieeran Moore finally caved in.
He said that: “We know there’s on going activity across Ontarians, we know we’ll
have high transmission risk. And that data element now has to be targeted and
focused to best protect Ontarians. To screen those who need treatment, to screen
those are working at our highest risk settings to best protect Ontarians.”
Video:

Dr. Fauci on MSNBC cleared up discrepancies behind the theories of COVID-19
stats.
He says: “The other important thing, is that if you look at the children who are
hospitalized. Many of them are hospitalized WITH COVID, as opposed to BECAUSE
of COVID. And what we mean by that, if a child goes into the hospital they
automatically get tested for COVID and they get counted as a COVID hospitalized
individual. When in fact they may go in for a broken leg or appendicitis or
something like that. So it’s over-counting, the number of children who are quote,
hospitalized WITH COVID as opposed to BECAUSE of COVID.”
Video:

Covid Deaths in question:

In 2020, Senator/Dr. Scott Jensen released a video showing his concerns about the
Covid statistics regarding the deaths.
He said: “In terms of the death certificates, on April 3rd, i got an email from the
department of health. That said very clearly, that we should report COVID-19 on
death certificates, if it is assumed to had cause or had attributed. Well that’s not
how we do death certificates.” He goes on to say that the official instructions say
not to do that and to specify the reason. Jenson says that health departments
ended up slashing their death numbers because of the issue.
He includes saying: “I’ve got the department of health in Illinois, where one of the
directer says ‘Just because we put COVID-19 down the death certificate as cause
of death, doesn’t mean that the patient died of COVID-19.’ she said that”.
He concludes by saying: “I just want to leave you with a couple questions you
could maybe ask yourself. Do we think it’s okay for physicians certify death
certificates to someone died of COVID-19, even if there was never a COVID-19
positive test obtained? Even if, there was never a COVID-19 test done? Even if, a
COVID-19 test hadn’t even been considered? And maybe the worst even if, even if
the family had no clue that the death certificate they received for their loved one
was going to say COVID-19?”
Video:

Elon Musk spoke on Joe Rogan’s podcast shedding his awareness about the

COVID-19 stastistics as well.
He says: “Just to add on an informational level, when reporting COVID-19 cases, to
separate out diagnosed COVID versus had COVID like symptoms. The list of
symptoms that could be COVID at this point is like a mile long. So if you’re ill at all
then it’s like, ya it could be COVID. So just to give people better information,
definitely diagnosed with covid or had covid like symptoms. We’re conflating
those two, so it looks bigger than it is. Then if somebody dies, was COVID a
primary cause of the death or not? If someone has COVID and gets eaten by a
shark, we find their arm, their arm has covid, it’s going to get recorded as a COVID
death.”
Video:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s