There are many confusions and conflicting information when it comes to the existence of COVD-19.
The following are some interesting facts:
The NCBI/NLM/NIH even have doubts as to the method used for “isolating” COVID-19 through stock:
“Questioning the methods for growing cell culture through “stock”.
“Two manipulations commonly performed in virology laboratories may change the phenotype of a virus population. In the first, a virus is deliberately “adapted” to a new host, such as mice, through sequential passage from animal to animal. By recovering virus from diseased animals at each passage and inoculating it into a new cohort, researchers impose selective pressure and obtain a virus population more virulent for the new host. In the second setting, researchers “amplify” a virus by preparing a large stock in cell culture, such as Vero cells. Although this procedure is frequently considered only to increase the quantity of virus, some degree of selection will also take place, favoring members of the virus population that replicate best in the chosen cells. Tissue culture passage may have unexpected results when the amplified stock is used in subsequent experiments, such as attempts to “model” a human disease in nonhuman primates (NHPs). Some viruses, such as Marburg or Ebola, cause a severe illness in NHPs, even when the inoculated agent has previously undergone multiple tissue culture passages. In contrast, when researchers have inoculated NHPs with cell culture preparations of the hantaviruses that cause hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) and hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS), little or no illness has been observed. These outcomes have traditionally been attributed to an inherent resistance of NHPs to these viruses, but we have recently found that it was in fact the result of attenuation of the viruses in cell culture (Safronetz et al., 2014). In this article, we examine the possibility that other “failures” of viruses to cause disease in NHPs may have resulted from the inadvertent modification of the agent being studied.”
The first official COVID-19 sample named:
“Wuhan-Hu- 1”, sample from Wuhan patient, PCR Ct value: 35 cycles. Page 2 of “Isolation and
Identification of a Rare Spike Gene Double-Deletion SARS-CoV-2 Variant From the Patient With High Cycle Threshold Value”:
The first official COVID-19 sample in USA named:
“USA-WA1/2020 (MN985325)”, sample from USA patient traveled from Wuhan January 2020. CDC’s version of their isolate (wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article) says it 100% matches the USA-WA1/2020 sample, but the BEI Resources claim the isolation method (NR-52286) is as stated: “The suitability of this product as a whole cell antigen preparation has not been assessed and may be influenced by the protein content largely contributed by the host cell and fetal bovine serum used during virus propagation”.
Sample in Korea named:
“BetaCoV/Korea/KCDC03/2020”, sample of patient in Korea, PCR Ct value: 40 cycles. Page 4 of
March 11, 2020 – Prime minister outlines Canada’s covid-19 response.
April 21, 2020 – Now that the announced pandemic is indeed here, the same Rockefeller Foundation came forward with step two: a handbook on how to implement new control systems during this pandemic. Only when all the required control networks are in place, can the world open up again.
‘Digital apps and privacy-protected tracking software should be widely used to enable more complete contact tracking.’ page 6
According to their ‘Scenario of the future’ the entire world population should get a digital ID that
indicates who has received all the vaccines, can get access to schools, concerts, churches, public
transport etc. Page 18
October 13, 2020 – The World Bank’s COVID-19 Strategic Preparedness and Response Program:
“The proposed Additional Financing to the existing COVID-19 Strategic Preparedness and Response Program utilizing the Multiphase Programmatic Approach (“Global COVID-19 MPA”) will significantly expand Bank support to client countries for COVID-19 vaccination, with the aim to support vaccination of1 billion people globally.”
Project expected to end Dec 31, 2025.
How are they able to predict the end of the pandemic?
March 1, 2021 – Christine Massey, the Deputy Minister of the BC Ministry of Mental Health and
Addictions emailed the CDC requesting the studies/reports possessing/custody/control of the
purification/isolation of any “influenza virus” said to have caused a disease in humans. Directly from a sample taken from a diseased human, where the patient was NOT first combined with any other source of genetic material.
On April 12, 2021, the CDC Responded saying “A search of our records failed to reveal any documents pertaining to your request. Specifically, the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases searched and found no records regarding the requested specified records.
September 15, 2021 – “The Government of British Columbia released data from their “Discharge Abstract
Database”. Implying that there was a minimal increase in ICU cases.
·Pre-Covid ICU 79.688 (2017/2018)+(2018/2019)
·Post-Covid ICU 79,696(2019/2020)+(2020/2021)”
Hospitalizations: 2015/16 – 442,992
2016/17 – 451,803
2017/18 – 455,393
2018/19 – 459,088
2019/20 – 461,022
2020/21 – 431,822
ICU: 2015/16 – 39,545
2016/17 – 39,953
2017/18 – 39,656
2018/19 – 40,032
2019/20 – 40,536
2020/21 – 39,160
Official BC Government PDF:
Official BC Government website pdf link: